RUB » Bibliotheksportal

Christian Waydhas, Teresa Deffner, Robert Gaschler, David Häske, Uwe Hamsen, Frank Herbstreit, Anke Hierundar, Oliver Kumpf, Georg Rohe, Aileen Spiekermann, Sonja Vonderhagen, Reiner M. Wäschle, Reimer Riessen

• \(\bf Background:\) The aim of this survey was to describe, on a patient basis, the current practice of sedation, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic measures to promote sleep and facilitation of communication in critically ill patients oro-tracheally intubated or tracheostomized. \(\bf Methods:\) Cross-sectional online-survey evaluating sedation, sleep management and communication in oro-tracheally intubated (IP) or tracheostomized (TP) patients in intensive care units on a single point. \(\bf Results:\) Eighty-one intensive care units including 447 patients (IP: \(\it n\) = 320, TP: \(\it n\) = 127) participated. A score of \(\leq\) -2 on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) was prevalent in 58.2% (IP 70.7% vs. TP 26.8%). RASS -1/0 was present in 32.2% (IP 25.9% vs. TP 55.1%) of subjects. Propofol and alpha-2-agonist were the predominant sedatives used while benzodiazepines were applied in only 12.1% of patients. For sleep management, ear plugs and sleeping masks were rarely used (< 7%). In half of the participating intensive care units a technique for phonation was used in the tracheostomized patients. \(\bf Conclusions:\) The overall rate of moderate and deep sedation appears high, particularly in oro-tracheally intubated patients. There is no uniform sleep management and ear plugs and sleeping masks are only rarely applied. The application of phonation techniques in tracheostomized patients during assisted breathing is low. More efforts should be directed towards improved guideline implementation. The enhancement of sleep promotion and communication techniques in non-verbal critically ill patients may be a focus of future guideline development.