Intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulins in critical COVID-19

  • \(\bf Background:\) A profound inflammation-mediated lung injury with long-term acute respiratory distress and high mortality is one of the major complications of critical COVID-19. Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-enriched immunoglobulins seem especially capable of mitigating the inflicted inflammatory harm. However, the efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched preparations in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is largely unclear. \(\bf Methods:\) In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, 316 patients with laboratory-confirmed critical COVID-19 were treated in ten German and Austrian ICUs between May 2020 and April 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Analysis was performed by Cox regression models. Covariate adjustment was performed by propensity score weighting using machine learning-based SuperLearner to overcome the selection bias due to missing randomization. In addition, a subgroup analysis focusing on different treatment regimens and patient characteristics was performed. \(\bf Results:\) Of the 316 ICU patients, 146 received IgM-enriched immunoglobulins and 170 cases did not, which served as controls. There was no survival difference between the two groups in terms of mortality at 30 days in the overall cohort (\(HR_{adj}\): 0.83; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.25; \(\it p\) = 0.374). An improved 30-day survival in patients without mechanical ventilation at the time of the immunoglobulin treatment did not reach statistical significance (\(HR_{adj}\): 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.08; \(\it p\) = 0.063). Also, no statistically significant difference was observed in the subgroup when a daily dose of \(\geq\) 15 g and a duration of \(\geq\) 3 days of IgM-enriched immunoglobulins were applied (\(HR_{adj}\): 0.65; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.03; \(\it p\) = 0.068). \(\bf Conclusions:\) Although we cannot prove a statistically reliable effect of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulins, the confidence intervals may suggest a clinically relevant effect in certain subgroups. Here, an early administration (i.e. in critically ill but not yet mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients) and a dose of \(\geq\) 15 g for at least 3 days may confer beneficial effects without concerning safety issues. However, these findings need to be validated in upcoming randomized clinical trials.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tim RahmelORCiDGND, Felix KraftGND, Helge HaberlGND, Ute AchtzehnGND, Timo BrandenburgerGND, Holger NebGND, Dominik JarczakORCiDGND, Maximilian DietrichORCiDGND, Harry MaguniaGND, Frieda ZimmerGND, Jale BastenGND, Claudia LandgrafGND, Thea KochGND, Kai ZacharowskiGND, Markus A. WeigandGND, Peter RosenbergerGND, Roman UllrichGND, Patrick MeybohmGND, Axel NierhausGND, Detlef Kindgen‑MillesGND, Nina TimmesfeldORCiDGND, Michael AdamzikORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-104003
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04059-0
Parent Title (English):Critical care
Subtitle (English):a multicentre propensity-weighted cohort study
Publisher:BioMed Central
Place of publication:London
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/11/10
Date of first Publication:2022/07/07
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:Open Access Fonds
COVID-19; Coronavirus disease; Immunoglobulin M; Immunoglobulins; SARS-CoV-2
Volume:26
Issue:Article 204
First Page:204-1
Last Page:204-11
Note:
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Institutes/Facilities:Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum
Dewey Decimal Classification:Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / Medizin, Gesundheit
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International