Poor humoral and T-cell response to two-dose SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in cardiothoracic transplant recipients

  • \(\bf Aims\) Immunocompromised patients have been excluded from studies of SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines. The immune response to vaccines against other infectious agents has been shown to be blunted in such patients. We aimed to analyse the humoral and cellular response to prime-boost vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in cardiothoracic transplant recipients. \(\textbf {Methods and results}\) A total of 50 transplant patients [1–3 years post heart (42), lung (7), or heart–lung (1) transplant, mean age 55 \(\pm\) 10 years] and a control group of 50 healthy staff members were included. Blood samples were analysed 21 days after the prime and the boosting dose, respectively, to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin titres (tested by Abbott, Euroimmun and RocheElecsys Immunoassays, each) and the functional inhibitory capacity of neutralizing antibodies (Genscript). To test for a specific T-cell response, heparinized whole blood was stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 specific peptides, covering domains of the viral spike, nucleocapsid and membrane protein, and the interferon-γ release was measured (QuantiFERON Monitor ELISA, Qiagen). The vast majority of transplant patients (90%) showed neither a detectable humoral nor a T-cell response three weeks after the completed two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination; these results are in sharp contrast to the robust immunogenicity seen in the control group: 98% exhibited seroconversion after the prime dose already, with a further significant increase of IgG titres after the booster dose (average > tenfold increase), a more than 90% inhibition capability of neutralizing antibodies as well as evidence of a T-cell responsiveness. \(\bf Conclusions\) The findings of poor immune responses to a two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination in cardiothoracic transplant patients have a significant impact for organ transplant recipients specifically and possibly for immunocompromised patients in general. It urges for a review of future vaccine strategies in these patients.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:René SchrammORCiDGND, Angelika Costard-JäckleORCiDGND, Rasmus RiviniusGND, Bastian FischerGND, Benjamin MüllerGND, Udo BoekenGND, Assad HaneyaGND, Zdenek ProvaznikGND, Cornelius KnabbeGND, Jan GummertORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-100387
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01880-5
Parent Title (English):Clinical research in cardiology
Publisher:Springer
Place of publication:Berlin
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2023/08/24
Date of first Publication:2021/07/09
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:BioNTech/Pfzer (BNT162b2) vaccine; Covid-19 infection; Immunocompromised patients; Immunogenicity; Transplant recipients
Volume:110
First Page:1142
Last Page:1149
Note:
Dieser Beitrag ist auf Grund des DEAL-Springer-Vertrages frei zugänglich.
Institutes/Facilities:Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International